Mae celfyddyd yn wleidyddol. Dyma atgofiad cras galeri “LD50” Llundain, a gaewyd i lawr gan brotestwyr yn ddiweddar. Roedd gan gelfyddyd warthus yr LD50 neges a symboliaeth ffasgaidd amlwg, gan wahodd siaradwyr yr “Alt-Right” i’w dangosfeydd parchus. Ond beth am gelf gwrth-ffasgaidd, gelf radical felly? Oes bosib creu celfyddyd radical a Chymreig heddiw? Ys wetodd y dramodydd Brecht, “ni ellid barddoni am goed pan fo’r goedwig yn llawn plismyn”. A ellid dramodi am Gymru pan fo’r strydoedd llawn UKBA?
Ymgais at ddrama wleidyddol yw “Yfory“, cynhyrchiad newydd Theatr Bara Caws, a ysgrifennwyd gan Siôn Eirian a chyfarwyddwyd gan Betsan Llwyd. Gwleidyddiaeth gyda G mawr: Gwleidyddiaeth y gwleidyddion a’r wladwriaeth, Gwleidyddiaeth y Bae yn y byd “ôl-Brecsit”. Gwleidyddiaeth noeth gyda’r bolitishen yn ei bants, yn wir, mae’r olygfa yn un amgen. Gwelwn y byd trwy ffenest fflat y gwleidydd a thad, Gwyn (Dewi Rhys Williams), a gwelwn y wleidyddiaeth grand trwy berthnasau ei deulu niwclear. Ar y noswaith cyn ei araith fawr dros ei blaid (y Blaid, gyda llaw), heriwyd ei weledigaeth gan ei bartner, Ellie (Caryl Morgan), ei ffrind-goleg a gelyn Llafurol, Kelvin George (Rhodri Evan) a gweithredoedd ei fab, Trystan (Aled Bidder).
“Arwres” Yfory yw Ellie, ac er i’r ddrama yn ei gyfanrwydd gwrthgyferbyniol datgelu meddylfryd Eirian, trwy ei geiriau hi cawn ei faniffesto. Mae rhagflas o’i syniadau amgen a “radical” yn y Rhagair: “Oes unrhyw wleidyddion yng Nghaerdydd yn meiddio meddwl am dorri cwys allai newid cyfeiriad cymdeithas yng Nghymru? … Neu ydyn ni’n rhannu’r un meddylfryd adweithiol a’r un culni gorwelion a Lloegr bellach?” Wrth i Ellie perswadio Gwyn i newid ei araith, daw’r “cyfeiriad” newydd yn gliriach. Datganolwch bŵer i’r cynghorau lleol, adfywiwch yr hen fro, atgyweiriwch ein colled o gymuned. Sut? Trwy weithio gydag UKIP (!). Awn i ail adfer bro, llaw yn llaw da Neil Hamilton. Newidiwn “gyfeiriad” o “feddylfryd adweithiol” Loegr, trwy gyd-weithio a’r blaid adweithiol Seisnig.
Golygfa go-iawn o’r ddrama newydd, “Yfory”
Y Dref Wen yn y Dyffryn?
Nid radicaliaeth a gynigwyd yn Yfory, ond yr un hen drefn. Yr un hen bleidiau, a’r “gobaith” yn y gwaethaf. Heddiw, ar hyn o bryd, mae gwleidyddion yn cwtsho UKIP (a holl drais y system ffiniau warthus) – nid yw’n safiad radical. Sut ydi hi’n bosib gweld bodolaeth UKIP, plaid Seisnigaidd a Phrydeinllyd, plaid hiliol a cheidwadol, fel posibilrwydd “chwyldroadol” i Gymru? Mae’r weledigaeth mor gul â’r fflat bach yn y Bae. Wedi’r cyfan, os ma dyfodol ein gwlad yn gorwedd da gwleidyddion, yn y Bae neu’r Cynghorau, da ni’n ffyced ta beth[1]. Cymeriadau dosbarth canol – ac yn bennaf, y patriarch Cymreig – sy’n pia’r ewyllys i newid tynged y genedl yn y ddrama, a hynny trwy’r sefydliadau swyddogol yn unig. Trwy freintio eu bywydau nhw ar draul eraill cawn wleidyddiaeth adweithiol y ddrama. Er i’r ddrama delio â chymdeithas wedi’r refferendwm Ewropeaidd, nid oes gair am yr ymosodiadau hiliol ac Islamoffobaidd, na’r ymosodiadau yn erbyn pobl hoyw, lesbiaidd a thraws, a gynyddodd yn ei sgil. (Caiff hîl cyfeiriadau tocenistaidd ar adegau (“yr oedd gennym ni ffrindiau du”), a defnyddiwyd “Pygmy” yn sarhaus ar adeg arall.) Nid yw’r weledigaeth radical yn cynnwys ffawd ddyrys ffoaduriaid na fudwyr a gaiff eu herlid, eu caethiwo a’u hallgludo. Yn wir, mae galwad Ellie am dai lleol i bobl leol, llaw yn llaw a’r diffyg sylw llwyr i dranc fudwyr, yn troi ergyd gwrth-wladychol yn un adweithiol. A dyma’r Gymraes yn hiraethu’n rhagrithiol am golled ei bro, a hithau’n byw ar gefn boneddigeiddio Caerdydd, ar ludw hen dai dosbarth gweithiol! Na – dyma broblemau crachach croenwyn ar aelwyd foethus yn y Bae. Trowyd Theater Bara Caws yn Theater Cocên pur a Gwin drud.
Wrth ystyried hyn, efallai nid oes rhyfedd i’w ffantasi o Gymru Fydd gwtshio UKIP. Eto, dyma siom mawr. Mae’n llawn bosib, wedi’r cyfan, i greu’r fath golygfa a’i beirniadu’n radical o’r tu mewn. Ystyriwch An Inspector Calls Priestley, da’r aelwyd gefnog yn datgelu gwacter eu cyflwr eu hun, neu Brawd-ddydd Kafka, da’r amynedd bourgeois yn bwyta eu hun yn rhacs. Yn sicr fe wnaeth Yfory cyffwrdd â hyn. Ar ei gorau, amlygodd adfyd gwag y hetero-deulu niwclear, “gêm” disylwedd gwleidyddiaeth y Bae a thwyll y sefydliad newyddiadurol. Cawn sawl linell anhygoel, wrth i Ellie gofyn a oes dyn tu ôl i masg y gwleidydd, neu wrth i Gwyn a Kelvin olrhain eu dringo diysbryd trwy fiwrocratiaeth y pleidiau. Eto, ar adegau arall, anodd oedd gwahaniaethu rhwng hunanfeirniadaeth a rhagfarn dosbarth canol, wrth i’r cymeriadau gwneud hwyl o’r di-waith nad yw’n codi yn y bore (a’r gynulleidfa chwerthin yn eu tro). Ta beth, nid yw’r ddrama yn dilyn y beirniadaethau i’w diweddglo radical. Yn hytrach, rhoddwyd cyfeiriad “amgen” iddynt, gan bennu ag atebion adweithiol. Atebwyd gwacter gwleidyddiaeth trwy wleidyddiaeth leol, ac atebwyd adwaith Brecsit da phlaid adweithiol Brecsit.
Ffeminyddiaeth ffaeledig
Rhyw hanner feirniadaeth yn ogystal ceir o’r teulu niwclear a’r gymdeithas batriarchaidd, er gwaetha bwriad ffeminyddol Eirian. Arwres ffaeledig yw Ellie, a mond trwy fod yn bartner i Gwyn, a thrwy ei berswadio ef, oedd y posibilrwydd iddi “lwyddo” o gwbl. Hi yw’r gobaith eto ar y diwedd gan ffoi’r aelwyd i ddyfodol newydd, ond eto, a’i ffoi’r un meddylfryd adweithiol wnaiff hi? Os mai cymeriad ffeminyddol yw Ellie, nid yw’n ffeminydd rhyngblethol, intersectional. Fel menyw untu, wen, ddosbarth canol a’i gradd Oxbridge, nid yw eu gweledigaeth yn dangos unoliaeth i bob menyw. Anodd ystyried fel gall unrhyw arwres ffeminyddol ystyried agosáu at UKIP, plaid warthus o batriarchaidd. Ond yn sicr, nid yw ei ffeminyddiaeth yn un sydd yn ymestyn i’r menywod mudol a erlidiwyd gan y system ffiniau. Nid yw’r dychaniad o wrywiaeth-hetero Gwyn chwaith yn un dwys. Fel cymeriad Dewi Rhys Williams yn Pen Talar, er gwaetha ei chwantau erys ef wedi’r cwbl yn hen batriarch Cymreig ystrydebol, y penderfynydd moesol mewn sefyllfa anodd.
Yn debyg, diewyllys yw’r mab Trystan o fewn ei deulu a Gwleidyddiaeth fawr y byd. Dim ond trwy efelychu gormes hetero oedolion y daw’n oddrych o gwbl, trwy berthynas rhywiol gyda Cerian, merch pymtheng mlwydd oed. Er i’r ddrama dangos fel gall newyddiadurwyr a thadau gormesu merched yn ogystal, wedi’r elfen-sioc gwreiddiol ymylwyd ar esgusodi’r perthynas problemataidd. Trwy greu Trystan yn ddioddefwr, anwybyddwyd ei sefyllfa o bŵer dros ferch. Yn y pen draw, nid beirniadu cymhlethdod patriarchaeth yw swyddogaeth y datguddiad, ond rhoi penderfyniad arall i’r tad, Gwyn. Dewis ei fab, gan blygu i bwysau blackmail Kelvin a’i newyddiadurwr, yntau dewis gweledigaeth ei bartner, gan fygwth sgandal iddo fe ac i Trystan. Unwaith eto, ceisiwyd peri cydymdeimlad at bobl bwerus – dyn ifanc mewn perthynas â merch dan oedran, gwleidydd sy’n gwynebu sgandal, tad â dewis Abrahamaidd. Nid eu problemau personol nhw yw problem fawr y genedl.
Efallai dangos sut rhwystrwyd newid Ellie gan y rhain oedd bwriad Eirian, ond gan mai troi at UKIP yw’r newid nid yw’n drawiadol. Efallai, ar y llaw arall, mai corddi’r dyfroedd oedd ei ddymuniad. Ond rhaid i ni siarad yn ddi-flewyn ar dafod: pan fo cyrff ffoaduriaid yn nyfroedd Ewrop, adweithiol, nid pryfoclyd, yw cwtsho UKIP.
Unoliaeth yn erbyn UKIP
Drama wleidyddol yw Yfory, ond nid yw’n ddrama radical. Mae’r actio yn ddawnus, y cynhyrchiad o safon uchel, a’r sgript yn un crefftus tu hwnt. Siom mawr bod y cynnwys mor geidwadol, yn enwedig wrth gymharu â Gadael Lenin.[2] Mae’n wir bod neuadd dan ei sang o siaradwyr Cymraeg, yn gwylio drama Cymraeg, yn ddigwyddiad gwleidyddol (a bron yn un radical) yn ei hun. Eto, cysgod Seisnigeiddio yw cyd-destun trist y gwirionedd hwn. Dathlwyd bod y ddrama yn rhan o “sgwrs genedlaethol” a bod “mawrion” y Cymry Cymraeg yn gwylio’r ddrama – a dyma anarchwaethus bach yn eu tro yn rhan o’r sgwrs hon i bob golwg. Ond rhaid gofyn pwy gaewyd allan rhag sgwrs genedlaethol, a sgwrsio beth a wnawn. Dyma fygythiad byd bach y Bae: caiff rhai ware’r gêm (G)wleidyddol fel Saeson wrth i’r genedl araf lithro o dan ein traed. Ofer yw hunan-ddathliad heb feirniadaeth, a siarad heb frwydro[3]. Mae angen sgwrsio pragmataidd, ac y mae angen celfyddyd radical. Y mae hefyd angen gweithredu uniongyrchol ac unoliaeth go-iawn. Pwy a saif gyda ni?
Nodiadau
[1] Rhaid cofio mai llywodraeth leol Calais, a’i Maer neo-ffasgaidd, sy’n ymosod ar ffoaduriaid o hyd, wrth i ddinasyddion ffasgaidd “gyfrannu” yn ffisegol i’r wleidyddiaeth. Ac yn erbyn cynghorau lleol bu nifer o frwydrau mwyaf chwerw Cymdeithas ac eraill dros yr iaith. Nid yw atgyfnerthu “gwleidyddiaeth leol” o reidrwydd yn radical.
[2] Beirniadwn yma gynnwys a neges ymhlyg y ddrama, canys hon a aeriwyd i fod yn radical. Ond beth am ei ffurf? Pedwaredd wal gwydr ffenest y fflat sy’n ein cloi fel gwylwyr yn unig, heb ewyllys i wir newid ffawd y genedl. Dyma’r un gwydr sgleiniog sy’n amgáu Senedd y Bae. Er mae gwydr wedi’u torri yw clawr y rhaglen, ni thorrwyd ffurf arferol y theatr. Y theatr hon yw symbol y byd Oedipaidd-gyfalafol i Deleuze a Guattari, lle caethiwyd chwant yng nghynrychiolaeth teuluol-niwclear (mami, dadi, fi). Rhaid i wir ddrama radical chwalu a symud tu hwnt i gynhyrchiad cyfalaf, fel awgrymodd weithgareddau Diggers San Francisco.
[3] Mae arnom ddyled i Fred Moten am bwysleisio cyd-bwysigrwydd dathlu a beirniadu.
Fascists are trying to take Welsh and Welsh-language symbols.
These are racist, white-supremacist and violent groups. They attack refugees and migrants. They are Islamophobic and anti-Semitic. They are anti-working-class and patriarchal. They are ableist. In short: shitbags. There is no welcome for them in Wales or anywhere else.
Fascism must be opposed, whatever banner it raises. This attempt to exploit and twist our Welsh symbols and language towards right-wing and British aims must also be opposed.
In this article, anarchwaethus discusses this recent development amongst British fascists of snatching Wales’ symbols and our stance as anti-fascists against Britishness.
New tendency – same old shitbags
The presence of fascists in Wales is hardly new. Moseley’s Blackshirts tried to hold meetings in South Wales in the 30s for example, where they were welcomed by bricks, bottles and fists.[1]
What’s new is this tendency amongst British fascists to appropriate Welsh symbolism, including anti-British symbols. As far as we know, this couldn’t be imagined some twenty years ago. Back then, if these fascists spoke of Wales, Welshness or the Welsh-language, their rhetoric and position was aggressive and anti-Welsh. This has changed, though we emphasise that the change is only symbolic – skin-deep.[2][3]
The Valleys’ Frontline Firm (a small group connected to the NF) has tried imitating the Welsh national football team’s badge for example. Except instead of “Gorau Chwarae Cyd Chwarae” [“The Best Playing – Playing Together”], they have a tiny little Swastika.
The VFF: From daffodills to… swastika. Shitbags.
National Front Wales takes things one step further, flying a mishmash combination of yr Eryr Wen (old symbol of the Free Wales Army) and Baner Glyndŵr, anti-British symbols, alongside the Butchers Apron. (For context: this would be equivalent to flying the Union Jack, or a Unionist flag, alongside an IRA flag). Do they even notice the irony and contradiction? Who knows.[4] On the National Front merchandise website, since 2014 you’ve been able to buy this “Welsh” flag alongside a “hang IRA Scum” flag and Nazi imitations. Druan ar Cayo. There’s also a page in Welsh on the NF Wales website, where they attack “mewnbudiaeth” [sic – “immi-world-tion”??].[5]
NF Wales, 2015, dragging Welsh symbols through the dirt
Around ten years ago the British National Party started using the Welsh Dragon on its propaganda in Wales. Nick Griffin, ex-leader of the BNP, has moved to Llanerfyl in rural Wales – something (all too) common amongst rich Englishmen. But uncommon for such a Brit, he has (apparently) tried to learn Welsh, and has sent his children to Welsh school. (No shit – he was even spotted at the Eisteddfod some years ago!). Likewise, anarchwaethus has heard of one or two fascists in South Wales trying to learn Welsh in the last few years.[6]
More recently, Alex Davies has tried to compare Saunders Lewis and the battle for the Welsh language to the battle for white supremacy (!). Davies is one of the main members of the younger violent group “National Action”. (The NA is famous for their “Hitler was right” banner and for being the first ever right-wing group to be banned by the British state. In 2016 they tried (and miserably failed) to attack anti-fascists protesting the “White Pride” demo in Swansea.) For almost an entire painful hour, Davies spoke at a secret “London Forum” meeting held in Cardiff, whilst attacking Jews, using racists slurs and praising the Nazis. To close, he explained that “what I’d like to say to British Nationalists and to white nationalists, national socialists [that is, Nazis], what we can do is we can take from the Welsh movement some examples.”[7][8]
Alex Davies and the “London Forum”. On the left, with the Butchers Apron, on the right, with Baner Glyndŵr.
Lastly, UKIP has also started using some Welsh here and there. Like the BNP and others, their previous official stance was extremely anti-Welsh language, and like these other examples there’s no doubt that this change is only on the surface and that anti-Welsh language prejudice continues to run deep. (anarchwaethus isn’t sure whether UKIP can be simply defined as fascism in the same way as the above groups (another discussion).[9] But without a doubt they are still full of racist shit – amongst other shit – and they must be opposed. Fair play to Cymdeithas for taking a stance against them recently.)
Britishness
Despite appropriating Welsh symbols, or even anti-British symbols, Britishness is essential to all these fascists. None of them believe in a Free Wales in any sense – they oppose such nationalism. They want Wales to remain part of the British Union. Though on rare occasions they have mentioned or used the language, they do not worry or fight for it, nor do they identify with the struggles of our national past.[10] Other than the Welsh nationalist symbols that they take, they do not have a single feature of Welsh nationalism(s) (the struggle for the language, anti-militarism or pacifism, self-rule, independence or freedom for Wales, international solidarity with other oppressed nations and so on).[11] The opposite is true: they proudly bathe in their Britishness (a white Britishness of course). Little Wales within Great Britain is their empty Welshness.
There’s little to be shocked about here. They are following a familiar tradition of British-Welshness, which grips some Welsh symbols, and is happy to take pride in Welshness to an extent, so long as it’s within the British imperialist order. This is the shitty mythology of the Royal Welch Fusiliers, the lie of Rorke’s Drifft, Henry the VII, David Lloyd George and so on.[12] The twist is that they do this through Baner Glyndŵr or Saunders Lewis!
“White Wales” or “Western England”?
The difference is that they connect this empty Welshness with obvious white supremacy. They imagine a little white Wales, whiter than the cities of England. Through miss-defining the Welsh as an essentially white “race”, Welshness becomes for them a symbol of white supremacy. For them, to be Welsh (or British) is to not be black, to not be Muslim or Jewish, to not be an immigrant from beyond the English channel.
This is of course total rwtsh – bullshit, historically and presently, which erases Welsh histories that aren’t white, migrant histories in Wales, the histories of Welsh-Jews, Muslims, Roma people and so on.[13][14][15] Though actual Welsh nationalisms record is far from perfect, it wasn’t in terms of the “white race” that they defined Welshness. Rather, their main definition of Welshness was and is the linguistic element and/or opposition to Anglo-oppression – to be Welsh was to be in some relationship of belonging (whether you spoke it or not) with the native language and/or to not be English. As most of the English are white, race in this sense was neither important nor central to their definition of what it meant to be Welsh.
Welsh Pride NOT White Pride: Antifascist banner from the protest in Swansea, 2014
Though this appropriation of Welsh symbols by British fascists is a recent move, there is a longer history of appropriation by white supremacists in general of Celtic symbolism.[16] This mis-association of the Celts with whiteness plays an important part in the British fascist imagination here today (despite the fact that the roots of modern Britishness lies in Anglo-Saxon and Norman domination, rather than in the old Britons!).[17][18] This can be traced in turn to the racist Klu Klux Klan in the USA, who took pride in a mythology of “Celtic” (Scots-Presbytarian) alongside “Anglo-Saxon” roots. (Once again, the KKK’s use of the term “Anglo-Celtic” to mis-define whiteness is completely meaningless (and opposed) by Welsh nationalism.)[19][20]
The appropriation of the Celtic cross by white supremacists. (left) Llywelyn’s Battle Standard, (right) Racist shitbags flag. “Wylit, wylit, Lywelyn / Wylit waed pe gwelit hyn” [“Weep, weep, Llywelyn / You would weep blood if you saw this.”] [21]
Hand in hand with this racist mythology, many white English people have chosen to move to Wales as they perceive it as a place “which is still white”. These well-off Brits have often risen in class, and choose to emigrate from English cities as a part of “white flight”. The obvious irony is that they moan about the death of their “culture” (by which they mean white “culture”) and “immigrants”, but are more than happy to move to Wales (or buy a second home here) and to Welsh-speaking areas, whilst flying their Union Jacks and insisting on not learning the language![22] anarchwaethus is not trying to say that all white English immigrants to Wales are “white flighters”, but there is definitely a proportion that are, and this is worth our attention. To an extent, much organised fascist activity in Wales can be connected to these types, and also to white English fascists who cross Offa’s Dyke for the occasional demo.
“Defending” England… in North Wales
There’s no better summary of this than the fascists’ chant at the “White Pride” demo in Swansea, 2014. Whilst flying Baner Glyndŵr alongside the Union Jack, the crowd shouted: “this is England, not Pakistan”(!).[23][24]
(Of course, it’s important to emphasise that there are non-Welsh anti-fascists in Wales, and that some travel from beyond Wales for anti-fascist protests here – fair play to them.[25] Needless to say these protesters aren’t insisting that Wales is England.)
Welsh Nationalism and (anti)Fascism
After stripping Welsh symbols of their meaning these shitbags then go on to define Welsh nationalism as fascism. This is again total rwtsh. Whilst figures like Julian Cayo-Evans and particularly Saunders Lewis had their faults – and this article isn’t here to defend these faults – they cannot be defined as fascists.[26] These figures were not representative of the whole Welsh nationalist movement besides (this was famously the contradictory case with Saunders and his own party, Plaid Genedlaethol Cymru, despite him being its leader). The Welsh nationalist movement has never been a fascist movement. As discussed already, the essence of Welsh nationalism was opposition to the British Union, Anglo-oppression and (to differing extents) the destruction of the Welsh language – clear anti-imperialist positions. Without a doubt, Saunders Lewis and to a lesser extent some others early in the movement had anti-Semitic positions, and at times an admiration of Hitler (it’s clearly these disgusting tendencies that attracted Alex Davies to him). We must attack this. We must also attack Lewis’ patriarchal bullshit and his opposition to class war, and he has been attacked on these things by other Welsh nationalists. But these positions do not differentiate him from many other individuals or parties at the time, whether this be the Tories, the Liberals or the Labour Party. There are some disgusting and reactionary individuals and tendencies, including anti-Semitism, to be found in nearly every movement. Neither anarchism nor even anti-fascism is an exception to this.
There is in reality some tradition of opposing fascism amongst Welsh nationalists. The English anarchist Ian Bone’s memories of fighting alongside Welsh Republicans against fascists in the 70s is a witness to this. It’s also possible to argue that a mixed attempt at anti-racism and solidarity with people of colour is a less central feature of Welsh nationalism.[27] If anything, this appropriation by British fascists of Welsh symbolism only seems to further provoke and anger Welsh Republicans against them.[28]
In defining Welsh nationalism as fascism, these fascists are once again following the British establishment. They have swallowed the lie of the British establishment during and after the second world war: the false accusation that all Welsh nationalists were Nazi-supporting fascists. (It is important to note that the British state also accused pacifists, Welsh communists like Niclas y Glais, the entire Italian community in Wales and many others the same.) They accept this lie, and see it as a good thing. Then, through taking Welsh nationalist symbols, they try to turn this lie into “truth” so as to fulfill the original accusation.
Anti-British Anti-Fascism
As discussed in this article, the spirit of these all these fascists is Britishness, Brit-Welshness if not downright Englishness.[29] There is in fact no example in our history (so far) of a native Welsh and Welsh-speaking fascism.[30]
Of course, this does not mean that Wales is some essentially radical nation without racism or oppression, as some niaive white Welsh people believe. The Brecshit vote in Wales and the growth in racist attacks following this is enough to cause worry without mentioning organised fascist groups.[31] State racism and the violence of the border-system is a nightmare situation besides. The detention centres on this island and the new ones along Europe’s borders where G4S and others daily murder refugees cannot be forgotten. anarchwaethus above differentiates somewhat between fascist groups and the racism of UKIP and the state, but it must be admitted that these lines are blurred, now as much as ever. Mae’r nos yn hir.
Fascists have less of a street presence on these islands than in the rest of Europe.[32] There is also comparatively less fascist activity in Wales than England. Whilst noting NF Wales’ infighting, the NA’s recent ban, the fall of the BNP and new groups’ (literal!) failure to appear, can’t it be claimed that anarchwaethus and anti-fascists give too much attention to unimportant groups? Our answer is firmly no. Firstly, whilst the above groups are small (especially in comparison to the EDL’s heyday), they are hardcore and more violent. Secondly, we must remember that the EDL and groups like Pegida in Germany’s sudden rise was relatively unexpected. We must smash fascism on every occasion so as to prevent such a growth. Thirdly, these fascist groups are connected, directly or indirectly, to racism and everyday shit on the street and to the racism and shit of the state. When fascism succeeds on the streets, racist confidence and prejudice against oppressed groups strengthens, and the whole political atmosphere is soured. To fight one we must also fight the other.
To close, anarchwaethus insists that we need an anti-British anti-fascism.
From a Welsh position, fascism in Wales continues to impose Britishness and Anglicisation, despite this symbolic change. Fascism also threatens the Welsh language with an alternative death, as Welsh is a dead language already when in the mouth of a fascist. Through attempting to take our symbols they deprive us of our traditions, killing any true life they have, just as Britishness has always done. The Welsh language must live: we must kill fascism.
From an anti-fascist position on these islands, we must attack Britishness in order to act effectively. Fascism does not exist in a vacuum – it has a home, language and culture. White Britishness is the dominating culture of fascism on these islands, and the English language runs through its veins.[33][34] Through killing Britishness, we shall kill British fascism.
We must physically oppose fascism on the streets, and take from their hands the flags of Wales.
Thanks to Welsh Antifa, Disuj and Irish antifascist flags for inspiring the new baner.
Translation notes: Many Welsh words and meaning have no English equivelant. “Tramor” is used here as “across the sea” – that is foreign, but not including England or Scotland. “Seisnigeiddio” is used as “Anglicisation” – the meaning is fairly obvious, but has a linguistic emphasis (the erasure of the Welsh language (or other languages) by English). Likewise, the Welsh-language has seperate words for: the Welsh-language – “y Gymraeg”, Welsh – “Cymreig”, Welshness – “Cymreictod”, the Welsh people – “Cymry” and Wales – “Cymru”. We’ve tried to be clear here. Britishness is used in place of “Prydeindod”, from J. R. Jones’ work.
2 This surface change can be compared to the EDL’s misuse of LGBT rights towards Islamophobic ends. Here we have another skin deep, hypocritical and empty appropriation appropriation: whilst an EDL member flies an LGBT rainbow flag the fascist crowd shouts homophobic chants.
3 Above, anarchwaethus looks at the roots of this development in world-wide white supremacy’s appropriation of “Celticness”, but why has this change amongst British fascists and Welsh symbolism happened recently? anarchwaethus’ guess is, on the one hand, a lack of direct action on behalf of the present national movement in Wales and the Welsh language movement, and on the other hand, the related acceptance of elements of these movements into the main-stream establishment. That is, the present national and language movements’ lack of teeth, and these same movements’ past victories. When militant Welsh nashies were in their heyday, trying to bomb the Investiture of the Prince of Wales, or burning down rich English holiday homes, it wasn’t possible for British fascists to identify with their symbols. At the same time, now (following past struggles) that the Welsh language, and elements of Welsh nationalism (devolution, civic nationalism) are more “accepted” by British institutes and politics, it’s easier for British fascists to appropriate Welsh symbols. (The quieting of unrest in Northern Ireland is related to all of this.)
4 It would seem to be the “Wen” [“white”] part of the Eryr Wen symbol that appeals to them. See this picture and the video and the fascist tune “Violent Storm White Eagle of Snowdon” on youtube.
5 Also note the Welsh name (“Waredigaeth” [sic]) of NF Wales members’ crap band. Despite the name, it’s interesting to note that musical member’s of NF Wales like David Powell, Bryan Powell and Chris Lewis are attracted to American Bluegrass music, not Welsh traditional music. (See the notes on the KKK in this article.)
6 We should remember with shame that the Englishman and racist Brit Enoch Powell also learned the language, along with several other languages. (The Powells were of Welsh descent.) (See the part on British-Welshness and racist perceptions of the language later in this article.)
7 See the video “Alex Davies: ‘Saunders Lewis & Militant Welsh Nationalism” on youtube.
We get another interesting appropriation of Welsh symbolism by the NA here, where they combine our national anthem (in English (!) (it is only ever sung in Welsh, except on very rare bizarre occasions)) and Scottish symbolism in a Brit-fascist image. (Compare this with the British-Welsh establishments’ appropriations mentioned in this article.)
8 Alongside elements of Welshness, the group has also tried to appropriate anarchist symbolism and tactics, a tendency amongst some fascists across Europe and North America. Likewise, we see in the propaganda of the NA, NF Wales and others the fascist tradition of attempting to appropriate anti-capitalist and working class rhetoric (see, for example, this leaflet talking about the “White working class”). Whilst looking at this new development in terms of Welshness, we must remember that fascists are incredibly flexible and paradoxical when it comes to taking symbols (see the note on the “EDL LGBT division” above). Past fascists have even appropriated directly anti-fascist symbols!
9 In contrast to the above groups, UKIP isn’t trying to be a violent group or movement “on the street” (though they came close to calling for violence recently following Brecshit (very similarly to Trump’s campaign threats about supposed election rigging), and many of them praise such acts). They support the racist violence of the state and the police, but through the Parliamentary system, not through recruiting or entering the institution directly (in contrast to the NF). They are not trying to be a power outside of Westminster and civil society, and this is not a part of their electoral strategy either (this is in contrast to Mussolini and Moseley’s Blackshirts, Hitler’s Brownshirts or Franco’s military coup). But despite all of this, UKIP must be looked at in the wider context of fascist groups like the above, “non-political” everyday racism and shit on the street and the “mainstream” racism of the state and border-system, and the reactionary rhetoric of the main parties (including Corbyn’s Labour Party, now that he too is spewing anti-migrant shit). Without a doubt, there’s is a recognition amongst many UKIP member’s and fascist groups of a “division of labour” which reinforces each other, and many shitbags are members of fascist groups and UKIP. As Britain First put it, “UKIP in the ballot box, Britain First on the streets”. Last, it’s important to note that many of the same anti-fascist tactics, especially those used against electorally inclined fascists, are very useful against UKIP, including for example “no platform”.
(Of course, UKIP’s Britishness, like the above fascist groups, is rank).
10 Alex Davies’ “lecture” comes close to being an exception to this, with him talking about Tân yn Llyn. But it’s important to note that he doesn’t praise the anti-militarism or anti-imperialism of burning Penyberth, nor does he call for similar things. Rather, he emphasises how white-supremacist fascists can gain attention through direct action. It’s an objective lesson to be learned, so as to fulfill completely different aims – they don’t identify emotionally with the event as so many Welsh people do.
11 The only weak similarity between some British fascists and some Welsh Nationalists is rhetoric over a “distributist” economic system and the attempt at a “third position” “between” capitalism and communism (see the “Welsh DistributistMovement” bellow, and Alex Davies “lecture” on Saunders once again). Whilst anarchwaethus disagrees with distributism, it isn’t in itself a feature of fascism. Many in the Labour party and Tory party, alongside others from every corner of the political spectrum, have called for distributism and a stance between capitalism and communism.
12 This is a tradition as old as Edward I’s appropriation of the Arthur story so as to cement his rule of Wales.
13 The presence of Roma and Welsh-Roma people in Wales was essential to the continuation and richness of the Triple Harp’s unbroken tradition in Wales, our national instrument.
14 People of African descent have been part of the history of Wales since Roman Britain – that is, since the birth of the nation.
15 Daniel Williams emphasises Britishness’ role in erasing diversity within Welshness. Though he does this from a civic nationalist position, not an anarchist one (for anarchwaethus the problem is that state paperwork exists and defines our nationalities in the first place!), we strongly agree with this point.
16 This appropriation, and the perception of “Celtic” countries as “more white” is worth attention when considering that many 18th and 19th century racial theorists saw the “Celtic race” as the “lowest”, “worst” race within the white races internal hierarchy. (It must be emphasised that all the white races were seen as much “higher” than the others, such as Jews and people of African descent, and that this hierarchy was the most important difference). See, for example, the beliefs of John Beddoe or Madison Grant.
17 Defining the Celts as people within the “white race” is bullshit on several levels. The old Celts existed long before the white race came into being as a social reality and system of power (a development that came into play at the end of the Middle Ages). It’s likely that culture, rather than shared descent, was what connected the old Celts of these islands to the Celts of the continent. Today, though descent is not entirely unrelated, it’s in culturally and nationally that the term has any meaningful worth. anarchwaethus hopes to expand on this in the future.
18 See, for example, the surreal BNP puppet show explaining the history of Boudicca (“and Boudicca, was white” (!))! Despite what’s said, rather than Buddug her Latin name is used. Once again, it follows the footsteps of British institutional mythology – see Queen Victoria’s appropriation of Boudicca’s symbolism.
19 For these Scots descendants in the USA, previously planted on the front-line of colonisation in Northern Ireland, their use of the term Celtic did not mean Irish Catholics (and their emphasis was Scots rather than Gaelic). By their second-embodiment anti-Catholicism was an essential part of the KKK whilst they attacked more recent migrants to the USA from the rest of Europe. We can see here a connection between the KKK’s burning crosses (an appropriation of an old Scottish Clansman tradition, which also began during their second-embodiment), and the tradition of burning crosses at Lewes bonfire in England, an event with anti-Catholic and anti-Irish roots. (Similarly to the KKK, some in Lewes bonfire continue to blacken their faces, despite calls to stop from people of colour).
(Though he apologises for colonisation (he talks about “celebrating” Scottish settlers), ignoring for the most part co-operation between the state and the KKK and shaking hands (!) and giving platform to a KKK leader, Neil Oliver’s recent BBC documentary discussing this topic is interesting and important.)
20 We then see this kind of white supremacy “returning” home. Content warning for the next links – they deal with racist and disgusting events. *Content note: the following links deal with racist and disgusting events.* See for example the history of the fascist Alan Beshella, or more recent KKK symbolism by fascists in the Valleys.
21 This history of appropriating Celtic symbolism doesn’t end with the KKK. This history, and the history of the appropriation of the Celtic Cross towards fascist ends is a complicated one and deserves discussion in itself (it’s likely that the symbol belonged to several European cultures before the modern age besides). In the 30s, some German and French (despite their opposition to Breton nationalism!) fascists began appropriating elements of Celtic culture. Jacques Doriot appears to be amongst the first to use the Celtic Cross towards fascist ends. In this period some fascist factions (small and unsuccessful) appeared on the fringes of the nationalist movement in Ireland, such as Ailtirí na hAiséirghe (who also used the Celtic Cross), and also some Breton fascists (it’s not obvious that these used the Celtic Cross).
Whilst discussing such histories we must also remember anti-fascist traditions in the “Celtic nations”. It was heartwarming to see Irish Republicans joining against fascists in Liverpool, and heartwarming to see an Irish anti-fascist banner flying in the battle at Dover. Similarly, though reactionary elements are to be seen in some Breton nationalist factions today, we must also note the Breton anti-fascist factions (alongside the Breton anarchist tradition).
22 Needless to say anarchwaethus insists that it’s Britishness and Anglicisation that threatens the Welsh language, not immigrants from across the sea. Anglicisation threatens both the Welsh language and their minority languages.
23 This is a common chant on English fascist marches. It was clear, from interviews and their accents, that the majority of the fascist crowd that came to Swansea that day were Englishmen from up North.
24 Alongside appropriating Welsh symbols, “romanticising” Wales as a white area and defining Wales as England, it’s worth noting that (male) British fascists have chose to travel to the mountains of Wales to hold violent training camps. (In this they are once again following the British establishment!) In 2014, different fascists attended the Sigurd Legion training group in the Bannau Brycheiniog, and in 2016 Britain First held a training camp in Eryri. The two camps including practising knife fighting. Many have connected the murder of MP Jo Cox, which happened shortly after the training camp, to Britain First.
25 Likewise, many Welsh antifascists have travelled (in 1936 and on other occasions) and continue to travel across the world in antifascist solidarity.
26 For a thorough discussion of Plaid Genedlaethol Cymru and the false accusations of fascism, see Richard Wyn Jones’ book.
27 They see, as anarchwaethus sees, a common enemy in the British imperialist order, though this order oppresses us in very different ways. We must, whilst talking about this history regarding Welsh nationalism, not ignore racist histories in Wales, in particular the role of many Welsh people in the British empire.
28 See, for example, this letter and answer and also this post: “A left wing photographer then shouted at a local NF member who was holding the Wales NF flag aloft that he wasn’t happy we were flying the white eagle of Snowdon symbol and his dad was ex free Wales army. This red clown was told that the REAL nationalists of Wales now have this symbol! It belongs to the real Welsh patriots defending the white Welsh working class! “We have taken the symbol and its now ours!” shouted the patriot, much to the red idiots disapproval.”
29 These fascist activities appear to be somewhat stronger in those areas previous called “British-Wales”, such as the Eastern part of the Valleys.
30 The closest we get is the “Welsh Distributist Movement” in the 90s. Though a number of the above groups are small, this group was minuscule (5 members apparently!). But English, once again, was their language, and it’s clear that main member Wyn Davies had strong connections to British fascists in the NF.
31 We must also note the connections between racist attacks and homophobic and transphobic attacks following Brecshit. There have also been the cases of hatred towards Welsh speakers on the street, which is (mis)perceived as a “foreign” language – see this story and also this tweet).
32 Some have connected this to successful antifascist action on these islands. Though we must celebrate such traditions, anarchwaethus feels that there are structural reasons which mean that such fascism is less useful to the imperialist state and British white supremacy. It could be argued that the elite in stable Britain doesn’t “need” fascism as much.
33 We occasionally see fascists from across the sea on these islands, such as Zjednoczeni Emigranci – and we must of oppose their fascism too. (We also of course get anti-fascist groups from across the sea, such as the famous Dywizjon161.) We also see occasional attempts at a kind of Euro-fascism (the explicit co-operation of fascists from different European nations, e.e. Pegida), but this in no way lessens the centrality of Britishness.
34 Fascism also has content beyond the national, obviously. Through killing white supremacy, capitalism, patriarchy and so on, we will also kill fascism. But we must also look at white-supremacy, capitalism and patriarchy on these islands in their British context and content.
Disgrifia’r erthygl rhwyg ar hyd Drebiwt, Caerdydd, y gwagle wedi hollti’n “ddwy wlad” gan wahanfur y rheilffordd [2]. Mae’r ochr Dwyreiniol wedi’u boneddigeiddio’n bwt – “fflatiau newydd (‘moethus’ ys dywed y datblygwyr gwancus) y Bae”. Dyma oedd ardal y dociau, ond wedi “troi’n ddiffeithwch ar ôl sugno pob diferyn o faeth ohonynt a gwasgaru’r hen drigolion i’r pedwar gwynt” codwyd “trefedigaeth o fflatiau drud o’r ulw” [3]. Yr ochr draw i’r rheilffordd mae’r ochr Gorllewinol, dosbarth gweithiol, aml-ethnig, wedi’u harwahanu o’r “ynys gaeedig” a’u “gwthio i’r ymylon”. Mae’r gymuned hon nawr dan y bygythiad y lleda’r boneddigeiddio gan eu halltudo nhw o’u hardal. Traetha “am y perygl penodol i ni Gymry yn yr arwahanu” a achosir gan foneddigeiddio. Mae’r Gymraeg, sy’n lleiafrif, yn gryfach “pan fo lleiafrifoedd eraill, a phan nad oes gafael hegemonig gan y mwyafrif”, gan wrthsefyll y pwysau ar y lleiafrifoedd ‘oll i “gymathu” [4]. Ie wir.
Erthyglau Diweddar ar (Gwrth-)Foneddigeiddio a Lleiafrifoedd
Braf iawn yw gweld erthygl, yn Gymraeg, sy’n ymosod ar foneddigeiddio Caerdydd. Braf yn ogystal yw gweld erthygl sy’n cysylltu boneddigeiddio i orthrwm lleiafrifoedd ethnig ac i dranc yr iaith.
Brafiach byth yw hyn ‘oll wrth ystyried rhai o’r elfennau hiliol a gwrth-fudwyr sydd wedi ymddangos yn rhannau o’r disgwrs gwrth-foneddigeiddio yn Ewrop. Mae rhai, gan gynnwys Class War yn Llundain, wedi ymylu ar feio cyfoethogion o dramor am foneddigeiddio, yn hytrach na chyfalafwyr ‘oll a chyfalafiaeth fel proses strwythurol, amhersonol, sydd wir ar fai [5]. Am feirniadai craff o’r elfennau hyn mae’n werth bwrw golwg dros yr erthyglau Saesneg diweddar:
Yn hytrach na feio lleiafrifoedd o dramor, rhaid deall ac ymosod ar foneddigeiddio Cymru yn eu cyd-destun o Brydeindod a Seisnigeiddio. Mae Morgan Owen wedi dechrau’r dasg, ond wedi gadael yr anghenfil yn ddienw fel petai [6]. Mae’n sôn am y bygythiad mae’r Cymry Cymraeg a lleiafrifoedd eraill yn gwynebu o “gymathu”, o gael “ein llyncu’n llwyr” – ond ein cymathu i beth? I’r “unffurfrwydd dienaid” mae’n siŵr – a heb os, rhywbeth gwag, estronol yw datblygiad sgleiniog cyfalafiaeth [7]. Ond eto, nid yw’n hollol wag o “ddiwylliant” – yn hytrach, mae ganddi ddiwylliant gwag. Prydeindod yw enaid yr unffurfrwydd dienaid, Saesneg yw’r iaith sy’n llyncu’r lleill i’w mudandod. [8]
Wrth gwrs, mae’n bosib gall ynysoedd bach Cymraeg (neu Gymreig-Prydeinig) goroesi yn “ein” dinasoedd yn ystod y broses o foneddigeiddio, wrth i ychydig o grachach fforddio byw yn y tai newydd costus, neu elwa fel landlordiaid ac yn y blaen [9]. Ond nid er lles yr iaith na chwaith y mwyafrif, llai-gefnog o siaradwyr Cymraeg fydd hyn [10][11]. Iaith cymuned yw’r iaith Cymraeg, ac wrth i gymunedau cael eu gwthio i’r ymylon a’i hollti gan foneddigeiddio daw’r iaith dan fygythiad. Iaith hanner-farw yw iaith a siarader o enau rhai gwleidyddion, siwtiau busnes a chyfryngis yn unig. Rhaid gwrthwynebu boneddigeiddio yn drylw felly. Nid ydym yn mynnu i foneddigeiddio derbyn Cymreictod. Mynnwn ddiwedd i foneddigeiddio. Y Gymraeg yn erbyn boneddigeiddio.
Ar y Gymraeg a’r frwydr am y ddinas, gwerth darllen yr erthygl isod (a’r cyfathrebiad fideo Cymraeg gan sgwatwyr sydd ynddi):
Brwydrau gwrth-foneddigeiddio diweddar yn Llundain
Yn olaf, i gwnnu’n calonnau ac i ddysgu tactegau am y brwydrau sydd o’m blaenau, mae’n werth edrych ar y llu o wrthdrawiadau gwrth-foneddigeiddio a thebyg [12] sydd wedi ymddangos yn Llundain yn ddiweddar:
2 Tybed a’i gyfeirio at ddyfyniad enwog Benjamin Disraeli mae Owen? (“Two nations; between whom there is no intercourse and no sympathy; who are as ignorant of each other’s habits, thoughts, and feelings, as if they were dwellers in different zones, or inhabitants of different planets … the rich and the poor.”) Ta beth, mae’r trosiad (a’i ddefnydd o’r term “trefedigaeth” ychydig yn hwyrach) yn un diddorol wrth ystyried y cymhlethdodau a’r rhyngblethiadau rhwng dosbarth a chenhedloedd y trafodwn yn hwyrach.
4 Mae hyn yn dwyn i gof ymdrechion Cell Caerdydd Cymdeithas yr Iaith i gysylltu brwydr yr iaith Gymraeg â brwydrau ieithoedd lleiafrifol arall yn y ddinas.
5 Rhaid cofio hanes gwrth-Semitiaeth, lle erlidiwyd Iddewon a ragfarnwyd yn aml i fod yn gyfoethog oll, gan ddileu’r gwirionedd mae dosbarth gweithiol oedd y mwyafrif o Iddewon Ewrop a gan “anghofio” am y cyfoethogion eraill.
Mewn cyd-destun ac ar raddfa wahanol iawn, weithiau gwelwn ragfarn debyg yn ymddangos yn erbyn y Cymry Cymraeg – y cyhuddiad ffals ein bod ni i gyd yn elît cyfoethog! Mae hoywon hefyd wedi dioddef gan ragfarn popiwlaidd tebyg – cyhuddiadau o “bourgeois decadence” ac yn y blaen (gwelwch yr erthygl ar “Hipsterphobia” a rhywedd uchod). Mae’r rhain ‘oll yn esiamplau o bŵer yn bachu ac yn gwyrdroi disgwrs y frwydr ddosbarthiadol at ddibenion adweithiol, gan atgyfnerthu gormesau gwahanol a gan atgyfnerthu gormes y dosbarth gweithiol yn ogystal. Hynny yw, er iddynt honni ymosod ar yr elît a’r cyfoethog, mewn gwirionedd maent yn amddiffyn y cyfoethog ac yn ymosod ar leiafrifoedd gorthrymedig. (Gwelwch Trump neu Farage er enghraifft – yr elît yn honni nad ydynt yn elît ac eu bod nhw yn erbyn yr elît!) Ych a fi.
6 Mae erthygl Morgan Owen yn nodi (ac anarchwaethus yn lled gytuno) “Nid yw cyfalafiaeth yn parchu cymunedau na chenhedloedd nac ieithoedd: bwrir hwynt heibio fel pob rhwystr arall i’r farchnad, oni bai am yr achlysuron hynny lle y gellir eu defnyddio at ddibenion masnachol.” Ond yn y geiriau olaf gwelwn agoriad holl bwysig: pa genhedloedd, a pha ieithoedd, ac at ba ddibenion masnachol? Trwy Brydeindod daeth cyfalaf i reibio Cymru, trwy Brydeindod y allforiwyd – a gorfodwyd – cyfalafiaeth dros rannau helaeth o’r byd. Eto, ni fydd cyfalafiaeth Gymreig na Chymraeg yn atal tranc yr iaith na chwaith yn rhyddhau Cymru.
7 Yn dilyn cysyniad y Karl Marx ifanc o “entfremdung” (“alienation“) defnyddiwn “estronol” fanyn. Roedd defnydd Marx o’r gair yn ddiddorol canys y gwelwyd ac erlidiwyd ef trwy ei oes am fod yn lleiafrif “estron” o dras Iddewig (er iddo gymathu). Yn ei ddull arferol trodd Marx pethe ben i waered fel petai, gan gyhuddo cymdeithas cyfalafiaeth o fod yn estroniedig. Mae cyfalaf yn bŵer estron, diarth, amhersonol, sydd yn estroneiddio‘r gweithiwr oddi wrth gynnyrch ei lafur, oddi wrth ei waith, oddi wrth ei gyd-weithwyr, oddi wrth ei hun ac oddi wrth natur.
8 Onid yw dadl anarchwaethus nawr yr un peth a’r rhai beirniadwyd ychydig yn gynt, un sydd yn beio Saeson cyfoethog am foneddigeiddio? Nac ydi, am sawl rheswm. Yn gyntaf, Prydeindod a Seisnigeiddio, yw’r broblem, ac er bod y rhain yn gysylltiedig i’r Saeson fel cenedl, ac i Saeson fel unigolion, nid ydynt yr un peth. Mae’r gwahaniaeth yn un bwysig. Gall Cymry (gan gynnwys Cymry Cymraeg) hybu Prydeindod a Seisnigeiddio, neu fod yn rhan digon bodlon o broses sydd yn gysylltiedig i’r pethe hyn, fel dadleuwn uchod. Mae hefyd yn bosib i Saeson bradu eu Prydeindod a gwrthwynebu Seisnigeiddio, fel mae sawl wedi ar hyd ein hanes. Yn ail, rhaid deall y perthynas rhwng y Saeson a’r Cymry o fewn hanes ein gwladychiad. Nid lleiafrif (yn yr ystyr meintiol nac ansoddol) erlidiedig yw cenedl y Saeson, na chwaith cydgenedl gydradd, ond cenedl sydd mewn perthynas o ddominyddu’r Cymry. Nid cenedl orthrymedig yw’r Saeson. (Nodwch fanyn y defnydd o’r gair cenedl, nid unigolyn – gwahaniaeth arall tra phwysig.) Mae nifer ohonynt wedi eu gorthrymu, wrth gwrs, o ran dosbarth, rhywedd, ac yn y blaen, ond nid o ran eu cenedligrwydd Saesneg. (O reidrwydd dyma ddarlun syml – nid yw Cymreictod na Seisnigrwydd wastod yn dermau diffiniedig na chwaith yn rhai sydd yn cau allan hunaniaethau cenedlaethol arall.)
Yn sicr rhaid gwrthwynebu cenedlaetholdeb cul, adweithiol, sydd yn beio Saeson (neu Brydeindod) uwchben popeth, gan anwybyddu (ac felly atgyfnerthu) gormes gan y Cymry.
9 Cofiem yr uchelwyr Cymreig a “wnaeth yn dda” o’r Deddfau Uno, gan symud o Gymru i fwyta ger bordydd Saeson mawr yn Llundain.
10 A hyd yn oed pe fydde hi’n llesol i’r iaith Gymraeg, fydde rhaid eu gwrthwynebu gan eu bod yn… foneddigeiddio.
11 ‘Drychwch ar y sefyllfa tai haf yng Nghymru heddiw er enghraifft. Ers dyddiau bri Meibion Glyndŵr mae nawr ychydig mwy o dai haf sy’n berchen i Gymry Cymraeg cyfoethog – rhai sydd wedi “gwneud yn dda”. Eistedda‘r rhain wrth ymyl y gweddill sy’n berchen i Saeson cyfoethog. Mae’r tai haf Cymreig a Chymraeg hyn yn dal i niweidio‘r cymunedau brodorol Cymreig a’r iaith Gymraeg, yn yr un modd ag y mae’r tai haf Saesneg. Nid yw’r datblygiad hwn yn golygu bod y frwydr ddosbarthiadol a diwylliannol yn erbyn tai haf wedi’u troi yn un dosbarthiadol yn unig felly. Yn hytrach, mae tai haf sy’n bia i Gymry Cymraeg yn wedd newydd i’r Seisnigeiddio. Mae gormes yn gymhleth, yn esblygu, ac yn rhyngblethol.
12 Wrth gwrs, mae’n bosib cysylltu sawl math o frwydr arall i’r brwydr eang yn erbyn boneddigeiddio (nid yw anfodlonrwydd na gwrthdystiadau terfysglyd yn codi prisiau tai!), ond cyfyngwn y dewis fanyn.
13 Rhannau o ddisgwrs Class War a sbardunodd feirniadaethau pwysig yn erthyglau uchod. Er gwaethaf hyn, maent wedi frwydro’n gyson yn erbyn boneddigeiddio ac ni ddylid diystyru hyn.
anarchwaethus / gwefan anarchaidd yn y Gymraeg 
